XXXVI. Observations relative to the preceding paper
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Remarks on the Preceding Paper Of
It is obvious that lp (/> 2:1) or any Hubert space satisfies (A). In §3 it is shown that Lp (p>l) does likewise. The method of proof is entirely different from that of Clarkson. In §4 it is shown that if X is any Banach space having the property that every function on a linear interval to X, which satisfies a Lipschitz condition, is differentiable almost everywhere, then also every function of ...
متن کاملSome Observations Relative to the Angustura Bark
in which I have employed it. A long time is, in general, required before the merits of a new medicine can be duly afcertained; for while fome extol it to the fkies 2s a cure for every difeafe, others are equally fond of depreciating the powers which it actually pofleffes. Experiments frequently repeated are therefore neceffary, before we can form a juft eftimate of the effe&s of any remedy. In ...
متن کاملThe COPD Pipeline XXXVI.
Contract Pharma is a publication that reviews, among other things, the pharmaceutical industry annually. Those of us who work in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) take an interest in the source of the drugs we use and Contract Pharma brings that information to us. Each year they report the status of the top 25 pharmaceutical companies.1 For each pharma, a report lists the newly appro...
متن کاملNotes to the preceding paper; length-to-length transmission as the basis of conduction.
After the publication of the preceding paper (1), I found a mistake in eq. (2) and another in deriving eq. (3) from (2), to my great sorrow. The eq. (2) as an approximate expression of Px should have been (1) The basic idea was dPx=-x/k' adx, in other words, that the potential contributed to the point X (the point y=0, fig.1 of the preceding paper) by a small active region dx at x, is proportio...
متن کاملThe Epr Paper and Its Preceding and Succeeding Perspectives
When Einstein’s revolutionary interpretation of Planck’s and other experimental results related to microscopic phenomena came out in the early years of the 20 century, the ideas he put forward were not accepted by the physics community at large due to the fact that he challenged the accepted wave theory. The wave-particle duality of light was nothing less than scientific blasphemy! However, as ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science
سال: 1836
ISSN: 1941-5966,1941-5974
DOI: 10.1080/14786443608636471